I can't sympathize with Assange. When writing internal applications, he is the sort of adversary you are defending the system against. Authentication, authorization, encryption, happen so that wikileaks can't leak. Radical transparency would mean basic things like protecting ...
database credentials would fail and any disgruntled and hostile foreigner could not only see government data, but destroy it. No space here to discuss whistle-blower laws, and FOIA but it seems like data security can be compatible with that.
♡ 0 ↻ 1I'd imagine this isn't controversial among DC techies, but shoot, in the comments about Assange, so many people think his brand of hacktivism is good.
♡ 2 ↻ 1