Have now participated in a bunch of tech interviews on both sides, I think most of the angst & strum und drang is about *marginal* tech workers.
The regular tech interview is to figure out who is in the top 20%. If, and this is assuming a job market exists for *marginal* tech workers, and employers have a need for mid-range techie, then there probably should be some alternate process
♡ 0 ↻ 0Possibly 2-4 week trial at minimum wage and in return staff get hired more or less indiscriminately (no coding tests, no knowledge questions, no college degree, nothing difficult)
♡ 0 ↻ 0Another model is to hire people for $0, but put them through a one-month tech training & if they deliver no their project, they get hired, at lower than the usual wages. (This would make sense for the techie that can't land a job because interviews are too hard)
♡ 1 ↻ 0This is likely to have a different sort of fairness problem because the pool of unproven, marginal tech workers is huge, so in a stack of 200 marginal candidates, one ones with unfair signals (rich parents, probably white men) will bubble the top.
♡ 0 ↻ 0And by midrange, I mean, someone who probably can barely write code who most likely will be doing things on a software dev team peripheral to writing code, e.g. testing, computer operators, documentation, etc.
♡ 0 ↻ 0