#csharp like #python doesn't have private functions, only functions that are callable with a clunky syntax (in c#'s case, reflection, in python you have to use Hungarian notation)
So if this is what people really want, then I propose anti-sugar for all the functions you don't want your users to call and that you want to keep to yourself. Antisugar functions will be declared in cobol syntax to make sure no one can call them without a morning of typing.
C# wasted its syntactic sugar on crappy arrays when it needed syntactic sugar for List<T> and Dictionary<TKey,TValue>. Hmm, let's pick out the worst, least used collection type and give it special syntax. #csharp
#csharp #iis #dotnet
If an App pool is shared by two sites, & site 1 wants assembly v 1.2 and site 2 wants assembly 1.3, will they co-exist or will it be a race to load & version conflict? This is a newish .net 4.5, owin, etc & might have fancy dependency injection going on.
#CSharp How can I turn a Task into a PageAsyncTask?https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35632308/how-can-i-turn-a-task-into-a-pageasynctask
#CSharp LazyApp<T> will code generate your application, publish it, hire your college roomates & create a kick starter on first invocation
#CSharp EntLib logging pulls in 2 dlls, 3 more secretly via unity. System.Diagnostics pulls in ZERO additional dlls and works better.
Tuple<EarlGrey, EnglishBreakfast> tuple = tx.f(x);
ohMyThis = tuple.Item1;
isSoUgly = tuple.Item2;
I can't put my finger on why tho #CSharp
FYI- The hash tag for R is #rstats , for C# #csharp for C++, #cpp , for C? Dunno, #clang means something else. Go is #golang F# is #fsharp